Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Rationality and Society
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jæger, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Economic and Social Returns To Educational Choices

Extending the Utility Function

Mads Meier Jæger

The Danish National Institute of Social Research, Herluf Trolles Gade 11, DK-1052 Copenhagen K, Denmark, mads @sfi.dk

Recent sociological rational choice theories argue that educational decisions are made with the objective of maximizing both economic and social returns to education. Economic returns are, for example, earnings, while social returns include the preservation of existing peer groups and social networks. In this article I develop a rational choice model of educational decision making in which both economic and social returns form the total expected utility of education. Furthermore, I propose and test two rational decision rules that utility-maximizing students should follow when choosing education that are empirically distinguishable from alternative and `non-rational' decision rules. When analyzing data on the choice of secondary education from the Danish PISA survey, I find that students' educational choices are consistent with the hypothesis that they attempt to maximize both economic and social returns to education. Furthermore, the findings suggest that economic returns to education are somewhat more important than social returns.

Key Words: educational attainment • rational choice • Denmark • returns to education

References

  • Akerlof, G.A. 1997. `Social Distance and Social Decisions.' Econometrica 65: 1005—27.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Andersen, A.M., N. Egelund, T.P. Jensen, M. Krone, L. Lindenskov, and J. Mejding. 2001. Forventninger og færdigheder — danske unge i en international sammenhæng [Expectations and ability — Danish youth in international comparison]. Copenhagen: Institute of Local Government Studies, Danish University of Education, and SFI-Survey.
  • Andersen, D. 1997. Uddannelsesvalg efter 9. klasse [Educational choice after 9th grade]. Copenhagen: The Danish National Institute of Social Research, Report 97:3.
  • Andersen, D. 2005. 4 år efter grundskolen. 19-årige om valg og veje i ungdomsuddannelserne [4 years after elementary school. 19-year-olds on choice of secondary education]. Copenhagen: The Institute of Local Government Studies.
  • Anderson, J.A. 1984. `Regression and Ordered Categorical Variables.' Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 46: 1—30.
  • Andreasen, L.B., T.P. Jensen, K.H. Larsen, K.B. Mogensen, M. Bøg, A. Jensen, and M.B. Nielsen. 1997. Unge uden uddannelse [Young people without education]. Copenhagen: The Institute of Local Government Studies.
  • Bank, B.J., B.J. Biddle, and R.L. Slavings. 1990. `Effects of Peer, Faculty, and Parental Influences on Students' Persistence.' Sociology of Education 63: 208—25.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Beattie, I.R. 2002. `Are All "Adolescent Econometricians" Created Equal? Racial, Class, and Gender Differences in College Enrollment.' Sociology of Education 71: 19—43.
  • Becker, G.S. 1975. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Becker, R. 2003. `Educational Expansion and Persistent Inequalities of Education. Utilizing Subjective Expected Utility Theory to Explain Increasing Participation Rates in Upper Secondary School in the Federal Republic of Germany.' European Sociological Review 19: 1—24.[Abstract]
  • Biggart, A. and A. Furlong. 1996. `Educating "Discouraged Workers": Cultural Diversity in the Upper Secondary School.' British Journal of Sociology of Education 17: 253—66.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Boudon, R. 1974. Education, Opportunity, and Social Inequality: Changing Prospects in Western Society. New York: Wiley and Sons.
  • Bourdieu, P. 1977. Reproduction in Education, Society, Culture. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Breen, R. 1999. `Beliefs, Rational Choice and Bayesian Learning.' Rationality and Society 11: 463—79.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Breen, R. and J.H. Goldthorpe. 1997. `Explaining Educational Differentials: Towards a Formal Rational Action Theory.' Rationality and Society 9: 275—305.[Abstract]
  • Breen, R. and J.O. Jonsson. 2005. `Inequality of Opportunity in Comparative Perspective: Recent Research on Educational Attainment and Social Mobility.' Annual Review of Sociology 31: 223—43.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Breen, R. and M. Yaish. 2006. `Testing the Breen-Goldthorpe Model of Educational Decision Making.' In Frontiers in Social and Economic Mobility, eds S. L. Morgan, D. B. Grusky, and G. S. Fields, pp. 232—58. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Cheng, Y. 1995. Staying on in Full-time Education after 16: Do Schools Make a Di ference? UK Department for Education and Employment, Youth Cohort Report No. 37.
  • Christensen, J.J. and N. Westergaard-Nielsen. 2001. `Denmark.' In Education and Earnings in Europe, ed. C. Harmon, I. Walker, and N. Westergaard-Nielsen, pp. 54—67. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Cohen, J. 1983. `Peer Influence on College Aspirations with Initial Aspirations Controlled.' American Sociological Review 48: 728—34.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Davies, R., E. Heinesen, and A. Holm. 2002. `The Relative Risk Aversion Hypothesis of Educational Choice.' Journal of Population Economics 15: 683—713.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Elster, J. 1979. `Anomalies of Rationality: Some Unresolved Problems in the Theory of Rational Behaviour.' In Sociological Economics, ed. L. Levy-Garboa, pp. 65—85. London: Sage.
  • Fass, M.E. and J.G. Tubman. 2002. `The Influence of Parental and Peer Attachment on College Students' Academic Achievement.' Psychology in the Schools 39: 561—73.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Forsyth, A. and A. Furlong. 2003. `Access to Higher Education and Disadvantaged Young People.' British Educational Research Journal 29: 205—25.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Foskett, N.H. and A.J. Hesketh. 1997. `Constructing Choice in Contiguous and Parallel Markets: Institutional and School Leavers' Responses to the New Post-16 Marketplace.' Oxford Review of Education 23: 299—330.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Gambetta, D. 1987. Were They Pushed or Did They Jump? Individual Decision Mechanisms in Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ganzeboom, H.B.G., P. M. de Graaf, D.J. Treiman, and J. de Leeuw. 1992. `A Standard International Socio-economic Index of Occupational Status.' Social Science Research 21: 1—56.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Goldthorpe, J.H. 1996. `Class Analysis and the Reorientation of Class Theory: The Case of Persisting Differentials in Educational Attainment.' British Journal of Sociology 47: 481—505.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Goldthorpe, J.H. 1998. `Rational Action Theory for Sociology.' British Journal of Sociology 49: 167—92.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Greene, W.H. 2003. Econometric Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Harmon, C. and I. Walker. 2000. `The Returns to the Quality and Quantity of Education: Evidence for Men in England and Wales.' Economica 67: 19—35.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Hatcher, R. 1998. `Class Differentiation in Education: Rational choices? ' British Journal of Sociology of Education 19: 5—24.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Hauser, R.M., S.-L. Tsai, and W.H. Sewell. 1983. `A Model of Stratification with Response Error in Social and Psychological Variables.' Sociology of Education 56: 20—46.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Hausman, J. 1978. `Specification Tests in Econometrics.' Econometrica 46: 1251—71.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Hechter, M. 1994. `The Role of Values in Rational Choice Theory.' Rationality and Society 6: 318—33.[Abstract]
  • Heinesen, E. and B. Graversen. 2005. `The Effect of School Resources on Educational Attainment: Evidence from Denmark.' Bulletin of Economic Research 57: 109—43.[CrossRef]
  • Hillmert, S. and M. Jacob. 2003. `Social Inequality in Higher Education: Is Vocational Training a Pathway Leading to or away from University?' European Sociological Review 19: 319—34.[Abstract]
  • Jencks, C., J. Crouse, and P. Mueser. 1983. `The Wisconsin Model of Status Attainment: A National Replication with Improved Measures of Ability and Aspiration.' Sociology of Education 56: 3—19.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Jonsson, J.O. 1999. `Explaining Sex Differences in Educational Choice. An Empirical Assessment of a Rational Choice Model.' European Sociological Review 15: 391—404.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Kane, T.J. 1994. `College Entry by Blacks since 1970: The Role of College Costs, Family Background, and the Returns to Education.' Journal of Political Economy 102: 878—911.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Kuss, O. 2006. `On the Estimation of the Stereotype Regression Model.' Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 50: 1877—90.[CrossRef]
  • Kysel, F. and G. Scott. 1992. `Leaving School: Attitudes, Aspirations and Destinations of Fifth-year Leavers in Tower Hamlets.' Educational Research 34: 87—105.[Web of Science]
  • Mangan, J., N. Adnett, and P. Davies. 2001. `Movers and Stayers: Determinants of Post-16 Educational Choice.' Research in Post-compulsory Education 6: 31—50.
  • Manski, C.F. 1993a. `Adolescent Econometricians: How Do Youth Infer the Return to Schooling?' In Studies of Supply and Demand in Higher Education, eds C. T. Clotfelter and M. Rothschild, pp. 43—57. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Manski, C.F. 1993b. `Dynamic Choice in Social Settings: Learning from the Experience of Others.' Journal of Econometrics 58: 121—36.[CrossRef]
  • Manski, C.F. 1995. Identification Problems in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Manski, C.F. 2004. `Measuring Expectations.' Econometrica 72: 1329—76.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Manski, C.F. and D.A. Wise. 1983. College Choice in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Marks, H. 2002. `School Composition and Peer Effects in Distinctive Organizational Settings.' International Journal of Educational Research 37: 505—19.[CrossRef]
  • Morgan, S.L. 1996. `Trends in Black—White Differences in Educational Expectations, 1980—1992.' Sociology of Education 69: 308—19.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Morgan, S.L. 1998. `Adolescent Educational Expectations: Rationalized, Fantasized, or Both?' Rationality and Society 10: 131—62.[Abstract]
  • Morgan, S.L. 2002. `Modeling Preparatory Commitment and Non-repeatable Decisions: Information Processing, Preference Formation, and Educational Attainment.' Rationality and Society 14: 387—429.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Morgan, S.L. 2004. `Methodologist as Arbitrator: Five Models for Black—White Differences in the Causal Effect of Expectations on Attainment.' Sociological Methods and Research 33: 3—53.[CrossRef]
  • Morgan, S.L. 2005. On the Edge of Commitment: Educational Attainment and Race in the United States. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Murphy, J. 1981. `Class Inequality in Education: Two Justifications, One Evaluation but No Hard Evidence.' British Journal of Sociology 32: 182—201.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Need, A. and U. de Jong. 2000. `Educational Differentials in the Netherlands: Testing Rational Choice Theory.' Rationality and Society 13: 71—98.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Oecd. 2000. PISA 2000 Technical Report. Paris: OECD.
  • Picou, J.S. and T.M. Carter. 1976. `Significant-other Influence and Aspirations.' Sociology of Education 49: 12—22.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Rangvid, B.S. 2003. `Do Schools Matter? The Influence of School Inputs on Student Performance and Outcomes.' PhD Thesis No. 9:2003, Aarhus School of Business.
  • Reay, D. and S.J. Ball. 1997. `"Spoilt for Choice": The Working Classes and Educational Markets.' Oxford Review of Education 23: 89—102.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Schizzerotto, A. 1997. `"Perche" in Italia ci sono pochio diplomati e pochi laureati? Vincoli strutturali e decisioni razionali degli attori como cause delle contenuta espansione delle scolarite' superiore.' Polis 11: 345—65.
  • Sewell, W.H. and R.M. Hauser. 1980. `The Wisconsin Longitudinal Study of Social and Psychological Factors in Aspirations and Achievements.' Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization 1: 59—99.
  • Shavit, Y. and H.-P. Blossfeld, eds. 1993. Persistent Inequality: Changing Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Taylor, M. 1992. `Post-16 Options: Young People's Awareness, Attitudes, Intentions and Influences on Their Choice.' Research Papers in Education 7: 301—35.[CrossRef]
  • Thomas, W. and D.J. Webber. 2001. `"Because my friends are": The Impact of Peer Groups on the Intention to Stay on at Sixteen.' Research in Post-compulsory Education 6: 339—54.
  • Thomas, W., D.J. Webber, and F. Walton. 2002. `The School Leaving Intentions at the Age of Sixteen: Evidence from a Multicultural City Environment.' Economic Issues 7: 1—14.
  • Van de Werfhorst, H.G. and R. Andersen. 2005. `Social Background, Credential Inflation and Educational Strategies.' Acta Sociologica 48: 321—40.[Abstract]
  • Wilson, K., B. Wolfe, and R. Haveman. 2005. `The Role of Expectations in Adolescent Schooling Choices: Do Youths Respond to Economic Incentives?' Economic Inquiry 43: 467—92.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Wooldridge, J.M. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross-section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Rationality and Society, Vol. 19, No. 4, 451-483 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1043463107083739
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jæger, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?