Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Rationality and Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WEAKLIEM, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by HEATH, A. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Rational Choice and Class Voting

DAVID L. WEAKLIEM

Indiana University

ANTHONY F. HEATH

Nuffield College, Oxford

This article uses data from the 1987 British Election Study (BES) to examine the rationality of class voting. Class differences in support for parties of the left and right have usually been seen as a direct consequence of interests in income redistribution. The authors examine intervening variables that might explain the relation between class and vote, including attitudes toward redistribution and other economic issues and beliefs about the parties' concern with social classes and other groups. Controlling for these variables does not eliminate the direct effects of class. Some evidence is found that social influences may affect vote directly without operating through attitudes, as suggested by the Columbia voting studies and also that voters do not use the same standards in evaluating the parties, contrary to the assumptions of the prevailing spatial model. Substantial revisions are necessary if rational choice theory, as conventionally understood, is to account for class voting.

Rationality and Society, Vol. 6, No. 2, 243-270 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/1043463194006002005


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Sociol RevHome page
C. Barone, M. Lucchini, and S. Sarti
Class and Political Preferences in Europe: A Multilevel Analysis of Trends Over Time
Eur. Sociol. Rev., July 1, 2007; 23(3): 373 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
International SociologyHome page
P. Achterberg
Class Voting in the New Political Culture: Economic, Cultural and Environmental Voting in 20 Western Countries
International Sociology, March 1, 2006; 21(2): 237 - 261.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Rationality and SocietyHome page
J. H. Goldthorpe
THE INTEGRATION OF SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH AND THEORY: GROUNDS FOR OPTIMISM AT THE END OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY
Rationality and Society, November 1, 1997; 9(4): 405 - 426.
[Abstract]