Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Rationality and Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by POOL, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The World Language Problem

JONATHAN POOL

University of Washington

Antagonists in the ancient controversy over world multilingualism agree that a successful artificial language must overcome a coordination problem: to motivate learners when few speak the language. It is believed that a take-off point must be reached, after which the spread of such a language would be self-sustaining. This problem may also frustrate other linguistic and nonlinguistic innovations. The dynamics of recruitment and defection, however, render a take-off point analysis dubious. A simple model of artificial language evolution supports this doubt. Despite low learning cost, universal competence in an artificial language, if achieved, might be unstable. More generally, any degree of penetration by an artificial language, from 0% to 100% of the world population, might be stable. The results help interpret the fact that the artificial language movement is small yet stable, frustrated yet complacent, and convinced that language choice is a social dilemma that needs coordination to prevent a deficient outcome.

Rationality and Society, Vol. 3, No. 1, 78-105 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/1043463191003001006
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Rationality and SocietyHome page
B.-A. Wickstrom
Can Bilingualism be Dynamically Stable?: A Simple Model of Language Choice
Rationality and Society, February 1, 2005; 17(1): 81 - 115.
[Abstract] [PDF]