Rationality and Society

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diekmann, A.
Right arrow Articles by Preisendörfer, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Rationality and Society, Vol. 15, No. 4, 441-472 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/1043463103154002

Green and Greenback

The Behavioral Effects of Environmental Attitudes in Low-Cost and High-Cost Situations

Andreas Diekmann

Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, diekmann{at}soz.gess.ethz.ch

Peter Preisendörfer

University of Mainz (Germany), preisen{at}uni-mainz.de

The low-cost hypothesis predicts that the strength of effects of environmental concern on environmental behavior diminishes with increasing behavioral costs. Thus, environmental concern influences environmental behavior primarily in situations and under conditions connected with low costs and little inconvenience for individual actors. In a first step, we develop and specify this hypothesis. Referring to two procedures, we then test it on the basis of an environmental survey of a random sample of 2307 respondents from the German population. The empirical evidence is positive. The low-cost hypothesis is not confined to the area of environmental research. It points to general limits of attitude-research (in high-cost situations) and to general limits of rational-choice theory (in low-cost situations), and suggests a strategy for integrating research in social psychology, sociology, and economics.

Key Words: Attitudes and behavior • collective goods • environmental behaviour • low-cost hypothesis • rational choice • social norms


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization EnvironmentHome page
K. Worthy
Modern Institutions, Phenomenal Dissociations, and Destructiveness Toward Humans and the Environment
Organization Environment, June 1, 2008; 21(2): 148 - 170.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Sociol RevHome page
J. Rossel
Conditions for the Explanatory Power of Life Styles
Eur. Sociol. Rev., April 1, 2008; 24(2): 231 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]