This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Völker, B. Articles by Flap, H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

WEAK TIES AS A LIABILITY

THE CASE OF EAST GERMANY

Henk Flap

Every institutional system ïnduces specific problems that have no standardized solutions for the people living in it. In this paper it is argued that people invest in relationships with certain others partly in order to solve these problems. Hence, the personal networks that result provide solutions to system-induced problems and they reflect the institutional environment. Personal networks of people living in the former German Democratic Republic (GDR) during communism are examined, and social capital theory is used to explain why communism did not produce social integration. In a communist society like that of the former GDR, weak ties are a liability, not an asset. Therefore, GDR citizens trusted only people whom they knew well. Since people in the former GDR were acutely aware of political control and the damage potential of weak ties, they invested only cautiously in others. They kept their distance from strangers and all others whose trustworthiness was uncertain and discussed politics only with people whom they truly trusted (the `niche'). Yet the shortages of the command economy forced people to rely on weak informal ties to secure necessary goods and services. Personal networks in East Germany had two specialized parts each kept separate from the other, a division of labor that vanished after the fall of the Wall. Our hypotheses are tested using multilevel models and triad analyses with data collected in 1992 and 1994 from two random samples in Leipzig and Dresden (n = 489). The first measurement focuses on the situation before the upheaval, the other the situation in 1994. Results show that during communism people indeed created `niches' consisting of dense, small networks of close relations with similar and trust-worthy others. Provision networks were maintained that were small, heterogeneous, and consisted of weak and uniplex ties. Furthermore, there was a relational `gap' between the niche and the provision network. These differences have gradually been vanishing since the fall of the Wall and with the political and economic unification of the former GDR and the former FRG.

Key Words: communism • liability • social capital • social networks • trust • weak ties

Rationality and Society, Vol. 13, No. 4, 397-428 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/104346301013004001


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. Bernardi, S. Keim, and H. von der Lippe Social Influences on Fertility: A Comparative Mixed Methods Study in Eastern and Western Germany Journal of Mixed Methods Research, January 1, 2007; 1(1): 23 - 47. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Gehlbach A Formal Model of Exit and Voice Rationality and Society, November 1, 2006; 18(4): 395 - 418. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. P. Borgatti and P. C. Foster The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology Journal of Management, December 1, 2003; 29(6): 991 - 1013. [Abstract] [PDF]