Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Rationality and Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Need, A.
Right arrow Articles by de Jong, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

EDUCATIONAL DIFFERENTIALS IN THE NETHERLANDS

TESTING RATIONAL ACTION THEORY

Ariana Need

Uulkje de Jong

In this paper, we test how well Rational Action Theory, as developed to explain educational differentials, applies in the Dutch situation. The question we address is the extent to which the mechanisms assumed to be at work can explain class and gender differentials in participation in higher education. After explaining the Dutch educational system and outlining Rational Action Theory, we formulate four hypotheses that we test using data from a panel survey among high school pupils first interviewed in 1991. Evaluating the theory, we conclude that the mechanisms assumed to be at work can indeed explain class differentials in participation in higher education. Moreover, we find support for the hypothesis that the mechanism of relative risk aversion is the most crucial factor in the model. We could not convincingly show that the theory explains gender differentials.

Key Words: educational differentials • higher education • rational action theory

Rationality and Society, Vol. 13, No. 1, 71-98 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/104346301013001003
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur Sociol RevHome page
N. Tieben
Parental Resources and Relative Risk Aversion in Intra-secondary Transitions: A Trend Analysis of Non-standard Educational Decision Situations in the Netherlands
Eur. Sociol. Rev., November 23, 2009; (2009) jcp053v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Acta SociologicaHome page
R. Becker and A. E. Hecken
Higher Education or Vocational Training?: An Empirical Test of the Rational Action Model of Educational Choices Suggested by Breen and Goldthorpe and Esser
Acta Sociologica, March 1, 2009; 52(1): 25 - 45.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Acta SociologicaHome page
A. Mastekaasa
Educational Transitions at Graduate Level: Social Origins and Enrolment in PhD Programmes in Norway
Acta Sociologica, December 1, 2006; 49(4): 437 - 453.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 SociologyHome page
C. Barone
Cultural Capital, Ambition and the Explanation of Inequalities in Learning Outcomes: A Comparative Analysis
Sociology, December 1, 2006; 40(6): 1039 - 1058.
[Abstract] [PDF]